hello. i'm coming up on two weeks on my IVs. at first, i thought my progress of getting better was so slow that i would for sure have to go for three weeks instead of just two. (i guess two weeks is normal for me.) but now i am beginning to lean toward just the two weeks. what do you guys use to determine how long you go?
i called my doctor today and i was discussing with him that i feel i've made progress with many of my symptoms (extreme fatigue, apetite, fevers) but that i've still had the same low pulse ox (93-94 when i'm usually 98 or so), still needing an extra daytime nap, and still getting short of breath. it hasn't been until yesterday or today that my pulse ox rose slightly to 96 and that i've had a noticable increase in energy.
anyway, my doctor seemed to be saying that you can't expect 100% recovery from antibiotics alone, which has been my experience in the past. and also that there is a "post antibiotic effect" that occurrs where you continue to improve when you are off the medicine. so i'm thinking my shortness of breate will get better as i get a little more active, and my fatigue is just going to take time to completely go away, which leaves me with my pulse ox that seems to be on the rise. for me, this adds up to 'let's call it a course.'
do you guys generally feel 80% better from abx? 90%? 100%?? i know it depends a lot on severity of your CF and how bad the exaccerbation is.
as i said, this was a really bad one for me. but maybe i've gotten all the benefit from the abx in two weeks? i don't know. i always struggle with this decision. it's just weird because when regular people go on abx for things, they feel better in 3 days and don't want to make it through the 10 day or two week course. it's like there's this extra time on the end they need to take it even though they feel well. is it the same for us?? thoughts??
i called my doctor today and i was discussing with him that i feel i've made progress with many of my symptoms (extreme fatigue, apetite, fevers) but that i've still had the same low pulse ox (93-94 when i'm usually 98 or so), still needing an extra daytime nap, and still getting short of breath. it hasn't been until yesterday or today that my pulse ox rose slightly to 96 and that i've had a noticable increase in energy.
anyway, my doctor seemed to be saying that you can't expect 100% recovery from antibiotics alone, which has been my experience in the past. and also that there is a "post antibiotic effect" that occurrs where you continue to improve when you are off the medicine. so i'm thinking my shortness of breate will get better as i get a little more active, and my fatigue is just going to take time to completely go away, which leaves me with my pulse ox that seems to be on the rise. for me, this adds up to 'let's call it a course.'
do you guys generally feel 80% better from abx? 90%? 100%?? i know it depends a lot on severity of your CF and how bad the exaccerbation is.
as i said, this was a really bad one for me. but maybe i've gotten all the benefit from the abx in two weeks? i don't know. i always struggle with this decision. it's just weird because when regular people go on abx for things, they feel better in 3 days and don't want to make it through the 10 day or two week course. it's like there's this extra time on the end they need to take it even though they feel well. is it the same for us?? thoughts??