What's new
Cystic Fibrosis Forum (EXP)

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Could use your thought/prayers!

point

New member
Jessi - - Wishing negative results for you! My husband had carrier testing last year and it is an emotional time. We had our results within a week and I almost wished we had more time to contemplate our reactions to the results. It took us some time/ discussions to decide to test so we were surprised that we would have results so quickly after the blood draw.

Overall, if you can get more mutations screened easily enough than by all means go for it, but just in case you aren't able to have the tests completed I wanted to point out that it may not change your overall confidence in the result. For example (sorry this is a bit winded), we opted for the smaller no. of screens which gave us 99.6% confidence that my husband was not a carrier. The other test offered to us (I don't think it was Ambry so I am not saying that these numbers directly apply to the Ambry test) gave us an additional 0.1% making us 99.7% confident that he was not a carrier.

Are you able to meet with a genetics counselor to discuss the tests and their relative confidence around the genetic screening? It may help put your mind at ease in regards to going with a larger smaller screening panel. Frequency of the individual mutations (and inclusion of the more frequent mutations within the screening) play a larger role in your assurance of your negative result than the no. of mutations that are screened. A panel can screen for 1000s of mutations but if some are so rare and their frequency is extremely low it doesn't really give you that much more confidence (statistically speaking) of the neg test.

Just something to think about and/or discuss with your dr.'s/ genetic counselor if they are available for you. At the end of the day, no test will be 100% confident on a negative test but your risk is basically non-existent.

Best wishes! I know how grueling it can be to wait for results!
 

point

New member
Jessi - - Wishing negative results for you! My husband had carrier testing last year and it is an emotional time. We had our results within a week and I almost wished we had more time to contemplate our reactions to the results. It took us some time/ discussions to decide to test so we were surprised that we would have results so quickly after the blood draw.

Overall, if you can get more mutations screened easily enough than by all means go for it, but just in case you aren't able to have the tests completed I wanted to point out that it may not change your overall confidence in the result. For example (sorry this is a bit winded), we opted for the smaller no. of screens which gave us 99.6% confidence that my husband was not a carrier. The other test offered to us (I don't think it was Ambry so I am not saying that these numbers directly apply to the Ambry test) gave us an additional 0.1% making us 99.7% confident that he was not a carrier.

Are you able to meet with a genetics counselor to discuss the tests and their relative confidence around the genetic screening? It may help put your mind at ease in regards to going with a larger smaller screening panel. Frequency of the individual mutations (and inclusion of the more frequent mutations within the screening) play a larger role in your assurance of your negative result than the no. of mutations that are screened. A panel can screen for 1000s of mutations but if some are so rare and their frequency is extremely low it doesn't really give you that much more confidence (statistically speaking) of the neg test.

Just something to think about and/or discuss with your dr.'s/ genetic counselor if they are available for you. At the end of the day, no test will be 100% confident on a negative test but your risk is basically non-existent.

Best wishes! I know how grueling it can be to wait for results!
 

thefrogprincess

New member
I know that no test will be 100% accurate. But of the 1400 or so known mutations, I am not comfortable with a screening that only checks for 100 or less. To me those odds are just not worth it. Even if we did have a child with CF we would love him/her like nothing else, but if I can do everything in my power to prevent my kid from having to live with CF then I will.
 

thefrogprincess

New member
I know that no test will be 100% accurate. But of the 1400 or so known mutations, I am not comfortable with a screening that only checks for 100 or less. To me those odds are just not worth it. Even if we did have a child with CF we would love him/her like nothing else, but if I can do everything in my power to prevent my kid from having to live with CF then I will.
 

thefrogprincess

New member
I know that no test will be 100% accurate. But of the 1400 or so known mutations, I am not comfortable with a screening that only checks for 100 or less. To me those odds are just not worth it. Even if we did have a child with CF we would love him/her like nothing else, but if I can do everything in my power to prevent my kid from having to live with CF then I will.
 

julie

New member
I know exactly what you mean Jessi <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">. THere is no guarantee that when I was tested, that they didn't miss an unknown mutation not yet discovered (ambry tested me for 1221 mutations, there are now over 1400), but at least having 1400 tested is better than just 100.

Sonia, the lab your dr. sent it to, is it "90% of all KNOWN mutations" or is it "90% of all mutaitons in their database" and if the latter, HOW MANY mutations do they test for.... Just some things to ponder. Things I never knew/thought about until I started doing research for my website.

Keep us posted Jessi
 

julie

New member
I know exactly what you mean Jessi <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">. THere is no guarantee that when I was tested, that they didn't miss an unknown mutation not yet discovered (ambry tested me for 1221 mutations, there are now over 1400), but at least having 1400 tested is better than just 100.

Sonia, the lab your dr. sent it to, is it "90% of all KNOWN mutations" or is it "90% of all mutaitons in their database" and if the latter, HOW MANY mutations do they test for.... Just some things to ponder. Things I never knew/thought about until I started doing research for my website.

Keep us posted Jessi
 

julie

New member
I know exactly what you mean Jessi <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">. THere is no guarantee that when I was tested, that they didn't miss an unknown mutation not yet discovered (ambry tested me for 1221 mutations, there are now over 1400), but at least having 1400 tested is better than just 100.

Sonia, the lab your dr. sent it to, is it "90% of all KNOWN mutations" or is it "90% of all mutaitons in their database" and if the latter, HOW MANY mutations do they test for.... Just some things to ponder. Things I never knew/thought about until I started doing research for my website.

Keep us posted Jessi
 

ladybug

New member
Good questions, Julie... I honestly don't know and will try to contact the old CF clinic to see if they have anymore info. since I am currently going on MY genotyping report and ASSUMING that is the same lab they sent DH bloodwork to. Since they found my genotype, perhpas they used a smaller sample since they found I was the most common, and had they not found it, they may have used a larger sample. Who knows?!?

Thanks,
 

ladybug

New member
Good questions, Julie... I honestly don't know and will try to contact the old CF clinic to see if they have anymore info. since I am currently going on MY genotyping report and ASSUMING that is the same lab they sent DH bloodwork to. Since they found my genotype, perhpas they used a smaller sample since they found I was the most common, and had they not found it, they may have used a larger sample. Who knows?!?

Thanks,
 

ladybug

New member
Good questions, Julie... I honestly don't know and will try to contact the old CF clinic to see if they have anymore info. since I am currently going on MY genotyping report and ASSUMING that is the same lab they sent DH bloodwork to. Since they found my genotype, perhpas they used a smaller sample since they found I was the most common, and had they not found it, they may have used a larger sample. Who knows?!?

Thanks,
 
Top