What's new
Cystic Fibrosis Forum (EXP)

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hope for Gene therapy cure

anonymous

New member
Giving Genetic Disease the Finger
By Sam Jaffe
Story location: <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,68019,00.html
">http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,68019,00.html
</a>
02:00 AM Jul. 05, 2005 PT

Scientists are closing in on techniques that could let them safely repair almost any defective gene in a patient, opening the door for the first time to treatments for a range of genetic disorders that are now considered incurable.

The breakthrough, announced in the journal Nature in June, relies on so-called zinc fingers, named after wispy amino acid protuberances that emanate from a single zinc ion. When inserted into human cells, the fingers automatically bind to miscoded strands of DNA, spurring the body's innate repair mechanism to recode the problem area with the correct gene sequence.

A method for fixing miscoded DNA by injecting foreign genes into cells won headlines three years ago when doctors in France and Britain announced a handful of successful cures related to X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease, or SCID, also known as "bubble boy" disease. But that method was ultimately proven unsafe.

In a paper published earlier this month, scientists at California biotechnology company Sangamo BioSciences showed that zinc fingers can be used to erase targeted portions of DNA without risk of harmful side effects.

"This doesn't just deliver a foreign gene into the cell," said Nobel Prize winner and CalTech President David Baltimore, who with a Sangamo paper co-author Mathew Porteus proposed this method to cure genetic diseases. "It actually deletes the miscoded portion and fixes the problem."

At the heart of the breakthrough is the concept of "if it's broke, break it some more." Cells have a method of DNA repair called homologous recombination, which fixes breaks in the double helix of our chromosomes. But the process only repairs places where the DNA has been cut, not where genes have been miscoded.

Using a package of synthesized zinc fingers, cells can be tricked into doing nano-surgery on their own genes, Sangamo researchers found. The zinc fingers home in like a guided missile on the exact spot in the genome doctors are trying to target and then bind to it. DNA-devouring enzymes then cut through the double helix of DNA at the exact beginning and end of the targeted gene, and a template of donor DNA helps rebuild the deleted strand.

While such a therapy has been theorized for years by Baltimore and others, Sangamo scientists are the first to show test-tube results with human cells. In a paper published June 2, Sangamo researchers showed how they were able to correct the defective gene in 18 percent of the T-cells extracted from the body of an X-linked SCID patient.

That should be enough to cure the disease, as it only takes one corrected T-cell to repopulate a person's immune system with healthy cells, according to Sangamo.

If successful in trials, Sangamo's technology would be the first successful gene therapy, three decades after the concept of curing diseases by tinkering with the genome was first proposed. Most gene therapy trials have failed because the methods of inserting new genes into cells (usually with modified viruses as vectors) haven't proved to be effective enough.

One trial that did succeed, but then ended in tragedy, was a 2002 French X-linked SCID trial that used retroviruses to deliver a new gene into the patients. The new gene cured the disease in 12 patients, but went on to cause leukemia in three of them. It turned out the foreign gene, in addition to producing the protein that vanquishes X-linked SCID, had the unexpected side effect of sometimes turning on a cancer-causing gene.

Sangamo's technology overcomes that problem. Whereas the French viruses inserted the foreign gene randomly into the host cell's genome, the zinc fingers are highly specific and can land only at the targeted gene.

"They've certainly raised the bar for gene-therapy safety," said Scott Wolfe, a zinc-finger researcher at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, Massachusetts. He points out that the early proof-of-principle work was highly toxic to the cells. The zinc fingers weren't specific enough and they created so many double-stranded breaks in the DNA that a lot of the cells chose to commit suicide rather than try to repair all the breaks. "They really seem to have solved the toxicity problem altogether."

Although X-linked SCID patients will probably be the first to try the therapy, the technology is extremely versatile for a host of human diseases. "Right now, its greatest weakness appears to be that it is optimized for very small patches of gene repair," said Baltimore. "If it's a long sequence of DNA that has to be fixed, this might not be the best way to do it."

Nevertheless, there are a lot of ways to attack diseases without replacing whole genes. Other potential targets for the therapy range from many types of cancer to cystic fibrosis and even AIDS. "If they can figure out how to optimize their zinc fingers for any spot on the genome, this could target any gene you want it to," said Wolfe.
 

anonymous

New member
Giving Genetic Disease the Finger
By Sam Jaffe
Story location: <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,68019,00.html
">http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,68019,00.html
</a>
02:00 AM Jul. 05, 2005 PT

Scientists are closing in on techniques that could let them safely repair almost any defective gene in a patient, opening the door for the first time to treatments for a range of genetic disorders that are now considered incurable.

The breakthrough, announced in the journal Nature in June, relies on so-called zinc fingers, named after wispy amino acid protuberances that emanate from a single zinc ion. When inserted into human cells, the fingers automatically bind to miscoded strands of DNA, spurring the body's innate repair mechanism to recode the problem area with the correct gene sequence.

A method for fixing miscoded DNA by injecting foreign genes into cells won headlines three years ago when doctors in France and Britain announced a handful of successful cures related to X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease, or SCID, also known as "bubble boy" disease. But that method was ultimately proven unsafe.

In a paper published earlier this month, scientists at California biotechnology company Sangamo BioSciences showed that zinc fingers can be used to erase targeted portions of DNA without risk of harmful side effects.

"This doesn't just deliver a foreign gene into the cell," said Nobel Prize winner and CalTech President David Baltimore, who with a Sangamo paper co-author Mathew Porteus proposed this method to cure genetic diseases. "It actually deletes the miscoded portion and fixes the problem."

At the heart of the breakthrough is the concept of "if it's broke, break it some more." Cells have a method of DNA repair called homologous recombination, which fixes breaks in the double helix of our chromosomes. But the process only repairs places where the DNA has been cut, not where genes have been miscoded.

Using a package of synthesized zinc fingers, cells can be tricked into doing nano-surgery on their own genes, Sangamo researchers found. The zinc fingers home in like a guided missile on the exact spot in the genome doctors are trying to target and then bind to it. DNA-devouring enzymes then cut through the double helix of DNA at the exact beginning and end of the targeted gene, and a template of donor DNA helps rebuild the deleted strand.

While such a therapy has been theorized for years by Baltimore and others, Sangamo scientists are the first to show test-tube results with human cells. In a paper published June 2, Sangamo researchers showed how they were able to correct the defective gene in 18 percent of the T-cells extracted from the body of an X-linked SCID patient.

That should be enough to cure the disease, as it only takes one corrected T-cell to repopulate a person's immune system with healthy cells, according to Sangamo.

If successful in trials, Sangamo's technology would be the first successful gene therapy, three decades after the concept of curing diseases by tinkering with the genome was first proposed. Most gene therapy trials have failed because the methods of inserting new genes into cells (usually with modified viruses as vectors) haven't proved to be effective enough.

One trial that did succeed, but then ended in tragedy, was a 2002 French X-linked SCID trial that used retroviruses to deliver a new gene into the patients. The new gene cured the disease in 12 patients, but went on to cause leukemia in three of them. It turned out the foreign gene, in addition to producing the protein that vanquishes X-linked SCID, had the unexpected side effect of sometimes turning on a cancer-causing gene.

Sangamo's technology overcomes that problem. Whereas the French viruses inserted the foreign gene randomly into the host cell's genome, the zinc fingers are highly specific and can land only at the targeted gene.

"They've certainly raised the bar for gene-therapy safety," said Scott Wolfe, a zinc-finger researcher at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, Massachusetts. He points out that the early proof-of-principle work was highly toxic to the cells. The zinc fingers weren't specific enough and they created so many double-stranded breaks in the DNA that a lot of the cells chose to commit suicide rather than try to repair all the breaks. "They really seem to have solved the toxicity problem altogether."

Although X-linked SCID patients will probably be the first to try the therapy, the technology is extremely versatile for a host of human diseases. "Right now, its greatest weakness appears to be that it is optimized for very small patches of gene repair," said Baltimore. "If it's a long sequence of DNA that has to be fixed, this might not be the best way to do it."

Nevertheless, there are a lot of ways to attack diseases without replacing whole genes. Other potential targets for the therapy range from many types of cancer to cystic fibrosis and even AIDS. "If they can figure out how to optimize their zinc fingers for any spot on the genome, this could target any gene you want it to," said Wolfe.
 

Faust

New member
Very good news. This is why I tell parents with very young CF children not to freak out. This could very well cure them some day. I think the older ones though are skAr00d (like myself). Something like this won't be perfected for maybe another 20 years, if then.
 

Faust

New member
Very good news. This is why I tell parents with very young CF children not to freak out. This could very well cure them some day. I think the older ones though are skAr00d (like myself). Something like this won't be perfected for maybe another 20 years, if then.
 

anonymous

New member
WOW, that is great news.

That is something i've been waiting to hear ,since my child was born 1yr ago withCF i have been worried sick not knowing what to expect
of her future. But there is alway's hope not just for the newly diagnosed.
We all need to have hope and just pray that god is with us, through this rollercoaster ride of ups and downs.
 

anonymous

New member
WOW, that is great news.

That is something i've been waiting to hear ,since my child was born 1yr ago withCF i have been worried sick not knowing what to expect
of her future. But there is alway's hope not just for the newly diagnosed.
We all need to have hope and just pray that god is with us, through this rollercoaster ride of ups and downs.
 

anonymous

New member
Sean Davis - I think you're right Us older ones, the ones who have been told a cure is coming but always at that elusive "about 10 more years" stage, will probably not benefit from these new advancements - but the horizon is looking clearer and clearer for the newbies.
wanderlost
 

anonymous

New member
Sean Davis - I think you're right Us older ones, the ones who have been told a cure is coming but always at that elusive "about 10 more years" stage, will probably not benefit from these new advancements - but the horizon is looking clearer and clearer for the newbies.
wanderlost
 

anonymous

New member
Well, I still have to hold on to that hope. I am 23, still fairly young, but who knows?

It could happen when I'm 30, still young enough hopefully to receive it successfully.

We'll see. But honestly, I'm so jaded by years of promises, I get discouraged.

At least there are wonderful treatment advances for us, I guess.

Christian
 

anonymous

New member
Well, I still have to hold on to that hope. I am 23, still fairly young, but who knows?

It could happen when I'm 30, still young enough hopefully to receive it successfully.

We'll see. But honestly, I'm so jaded by years of promises, I get discouraged.

At least there are wonderful treatment advances for us, I guess.

Christian
 

princessjdc

New member
I have high hopes on this, even if I am 25 right now, I still believe that one day I will be cured no matter how old I am, unless of course my health turns bad, then I guess my hope will go down, but now high high hopes right now.
 

princessjdc

New member
I have high hopes on this, even if I am 25 right now, I still believe that one day I will be cured no matter how old I am, unless of course my health turns bad, then I guess my hope will go down, but now high high hopes right now.
 

anonymous

New member
SeanDavis I think you're right too, but since I'm older and will probably bite the big one before this gets anywhere, I'd be willing to test it out before I go - for the younger generation, hey if I'm gonna go out I might as well do it trying to help. I don't think I'd really care if I died of cancer instead of CF.

Debbie
26wCF

aka littledebbie...didn't login
 

anonymous

New member
SeanDavis I think you're right too, but since I'm older and will probably bite the big one before this gets anywhere, I'd be willing to test it out before I go - for the younger generation, hey if I'm gonna go out I might as well do it trying to help. I don't think I'd really care if I died of cancer instead of CF.

Debbie
26wCF

aka littledebbie...didn't login
 

anonymous

New member
I am kind of surprised so many people have hopes of a cure. I have heard from many doctors that they doubt CF will ever be cured..but instead that advances in medicine will make it a disease that is "treatable" and one that people can live for many years with. That has always been my highest hope. I think I am more of a realist though and less of an optimist. Like if I went to a casino I wouldn't expect to walk out a millionaire, but instead spend the money I have for entertainment purposes....i.e. I will make the most of my life and the cards I was dealt with, but I wouldn't expect to wake-up some day cured of CF.
I may very well be alone with this feeling...but keeping my hopes in check won't lead me to disappointment. I expect tomorrow to be like today...and by doing so I don't wake up tomorrow disappointed.
 

anonymous

New member
I am kind of surprised so many people have hopes of a cure. I have heard from many doctors that they doubt CF will ever be cured..but instead that advances in medicine will make it a disease that is "treatable" and one that people can live for many years with. That has always been my highest hope. I think I am more of a realist though and less of an optimist. Like if I went to a casino I wouldn't expect to walk out a millionaire, but instead spend the money I have for entertainment purposes....i.e. I will make the most of my life and the cards I was dealt with, but I wouldn't expect to wake-up some day cured of CF.
I may very well be alone with this feeling...but keeping my hopes in check won't lead me to disappointment. I expect tomorrow to be like today...and by doing so I don't wake up tomorrow disappointed.
 

anonymous

New member
Ok this is the original poster of this topic again.

I have high hopes for this. The Cystic fibrosis foundation just granted 2 years of funding to the company developing these zinc fingers to optimize them to target the CF gene. These are some of the best and brightest scientists in the world so once this is optimized for CF only that gene would be replaced making it safe... Then simply what needs to be done is find an adequate delivery method... It's believed this has been found in the ebola virus. It has been modified so it cannot replicate and possesses no harmful properties but the basic proties of it fits perfectly into the top layer of lung cells without disrupting them and would allow the zinc fingers or other chromosone changing things which have already been created to penetrate directly into the stem cells and permanently make them produce only non CF cells. This procedure has already cured CF in mice and within these next couple years will be tested on human sized lungs as well as human lung tissue. The next step will of course be testing on humans themselves. But basically we have already cured one genetic disorder and have the method to repair stem cells... thus I believe that sometime within the next 5 years we will cure our first cases of CF in human patients... some possible side effects could exist but the zinc finger technology is so precise it would not be the fault of that. Hopefully it wont be much longer before this becomes a standard and fully safe procedure.
 

anonymous

New member
Ok this is the original poster of this topic again.

I have high hopes for this. The Cystic fibrosis foundation just granted 2 years of funding to the company developing these zinc fingers to optimize them to target the CF gene. These are some of the best and brightest scientists in the world so once this is optimized for CF only that gene would be replaced making it safe... Then simply what needs to be done is find an adequate delivery method... It's believed this has been found in the ebola virus. It has been modified so it cannot replicate and possesses no harmful properties but the basic proties of it fits perfectly into the top layer of lung cells without disrupting them and would allow the zinc fingers or other chromosone changing things which have already been created to penetrate directly into the stem cells and permanently make them produce only non CF cells. This procedure has already cured CF in mice and within these next couple years will be tested on human sized lungs as well as human lung tissue. The next step will of course be testing on humans themselves. But basically we have already cured one genetic disorder and have the method to repair stem cells... thus I believe that sometime within the next 5 years we will cure our first cases of CF in human patients... some possible side effects could exist but the zinc finger technology is so precise it would not be the fault of that. Hopefully it wont be much longer before this becomes a standard and fully safe procedure.
 

Faust

New member
Nothing can go wrong with using the EBOLA VIRUS to introduce genetic changes in a host guys! <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">


Anyways, just thought that part was funny. This stuff is starting to look more and more like the X-MEN comic/movie line. Wouldn't it be wild if them messing with our genes somehow created wild super hero like mutations, and those lucky few with the powers all of a sudden got all Magneto like (the villain in the series) and proclaimed that those new mutants are now the chosen rulers of the earth? Sorry, i'm a good person at heart, but if I happened to be one of those lucky few to be turned into some kind of super mutant with all kinds of amazing powers of whoop a*s, since I already don't like people collectively due to what we do/don't do, i'd have to be a villain I think.


Ok, with all that fun fiction out of the way, some of you guys seem to be forgetting something. We as humans ALL die, it's just some of us go before others due to being born with problems, or acquiring problems later on in life (parkinsons, cancer, etc). The whole idea is to get as much out of life as you can, and don't squander what you were given. If someone lives to be 30 and did amazing things and achieved so much to help others, and then you have someone who lived to be 90 or 100 and never did much of anything, who really had the better life? Would I want to live more than my almost 35 years? Well yeah, and no. CF has put a rather large damper on the things I wanted to do and worked hard to do in this life. I'm not nearly as bad off as most CF's, but i'm bad off just barely enough to not be able to do the things I wanted to do. Then of course we have the whole societal "gray area" where most CF people fit into, where there isn't really much help for them, especially when you "look normal".

I've learned a lot in my limited 35 years. A good deal of that wisdom is about people and their mentality, both collectively and individually. I personally can't stand people collectively, but individually I do care for them, especially those dealt a bad hand, or those who can't fend for themselves, and the same applies to animals.

Even if I was 100% healthy, aside from my life with my loved ones, life is filled with WAY too much total BS in every possible way, to think about living to 80 or 90 and dealing with/seeing/hearing it every day from here on out. Death isn't that bad of a deal. With death the pain and general anguish of dealing with this existance ends, regardless what you believe as an afterlife. As far as afterlife goes, you either die and you 100% cease to exist in everyway, or one of the bajillion different human created afterlife existances take place, then who knows (and personally I don't care, I lived my life fine). If you look at death strictly from a biological "it's the total end" perspective: I told someone once that maybe when we die we truely do blink out of existance. This freaked them out and they asked me to tell them why it didn't bother me. I told them "Well I don't remember anything before I was born, and that wasn't bad. So if I don't remember anything after I die, why should that be bad either?"


Would I vollunteer for testing this new technology out to try and help others? Sure I would. Do I think it will work as they plan anytime soon? No I do not. I think that if you are in your later 20's or any of your 30's now with CF, even in great shape (like myself at nearly 35), don't hold out hope for this or any other "cure". Just live as best as you can and take care of yourself as best you can. Death isn't a bad thing, all of us "go to the grave". Just try and limit the amount of regret that you will have on your death bed.
 

Faust

New member
Nothing can go wrong with using the EBOLA VIRUS to introduce genetic changes in a host guys! <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">


Anyways, just thought that part was funny. This stuff is starting to look more and more like the X-MEN comic/movie line. Wouldn't it be wild if them messing with our genes somehow created wild super hero like mutations, and those lucky few with the powers all of a sudden got all Magneto like (the villain in the series) and proclaimed that those new mutants are now the chosen rulers of the earth? Sorry, i'm a good person at heart, but if I happened to be one of those lucky few to be turned into some kind of super mutant with all kinds of amazing powers of whoop a*s, since I already don't like people collectively due to what we do/don't do, i'd have to be a villain I think.


Ok, with all that fun fiction out of the way, some of you guys seem to be forgetting something. We as humans ALL die, it's just some of us go before others due to being born with problems, or acquiring problems later on in life (parkinsons, cancer, etc). The whole idea is to get as much out of life as you can, and don't squander what you were given. If someone lives to be 30 and did amazing things and achieved so much to help others, and then you have someone who lived to be 90 or 100 and never did much of anything, who really had the better life? Would I want to live more than my almost 35 years? Well yeah, and no. CF has put a rather large damper on the things I wanted to do and worked hard to do in this life. I'm not nearly as bad off as most CF's, but i'm bad off just barely enough to not be able to do the things I wanted to do. Then of course we have the whole societal "gray area" where most CF people fit into, where there isn't really much help for them, especially when you "look normal".

I've learned a lot in my limited 35 years. A good deal of that wisdom is about people and their mentality, both collectively and individually. I personally can't stand people collectively, but individually I do care for them, especially those dealt a bad hand, or those who can't fend for themselves, and the same applies to animals.

Even if I was 100% healthy, aside from my life with my loved ones, life is filled with WAY too much total BS in every possible way, to think about living to 80 or 90 and dealing with/seeing/hearing it every day from here on out. Death isn't that bad of a deal. With death the pain and general anguish of dealing with this existance ends, regardless what you believe as an afterlife. As far as afterlife goes, you either die and you 100% cease to exist in everyway, or one of the bajillion different human created afterlife existances take place, then who knows (and personally I don't care, I lived my life fine). If you look at death strictly from a biological "it's the total end" perspective: I told someone once that maybe when we die we truely do blink out of existance. This freaked them out and they asked me to tell them why it didn't bother me. I told them "Well I don't remember anything before I was born, and that wasn't bad. So if I don't remember anything after I die, why should that be bad either?"


Would I vollunteer for testing this new technology out to try and help others? Sure I would. Do I think it will work as they plan anytime soon? No I do not. I think that if you are in your later 20's or any of your 30's now with CF, even in great shape (like myself at nearly 35), don't hold out hope for this or any other "cure". Just live as best as you can and take care of yourself as best you can. Death isn't a bad thing, all of us "go to the grave". Just try and limit the amount of regret that you will have on your death bed.
 
Top