This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If both parents are carriers, there is a <b>25%</b> chance that the child will not have CF. <b>25%</b> chance that the child will have CF. and <b>50%</b> chance that the child will not have CF but will also be a carrier.
If both parents are carriers, there is a <b>25%</b> chance that the child will not have CF. <b>25%</b> chance that the child will have CF. and <b>50%</b> chance that the child will not have CF but will also be a carrier.
If both parents are carriers, there is a <b>25%</b> chance that the child will not have CF. <b>25%</b> chance that the child will have CF. and <b>50%</b> chance that the child will not have CF but will also be a carrier.
If both parents are carriers, there is a <b>25%</b> chance that the child will not have CF. <b>25%</b> chance that the child will have CF. and <b>50%</b> chance that the child will not have CF but will also be a carrier.
If both parents are carriers, there is a <b>25%</b> chance that the child will not have CF. <b>25%</b> chance that the child will have CF. and <b>50%</b> chance that the child will not have CF but will also be a carrier.
Actually un-true, quite a number of men who are CF <u>carriers</u> ARE infertile due to absence of the Vas deferens (CBAVD). Whether this is a "symptomatic carrier" or actually has CF but they have not found a second mutation is unknown. but their OB doctor isn't incorrect about this. It is a possibility.
Bignana, they should look into doing IVF with PGD. Some insurance companies will cover it (after an appeal) when presented with the cost/risk/% of having a baby with CF versus the cost of IVF with PGD to prevent a CF baby.
Actually un-true, quite a number of men who are CF <u>carriers</u> ARE infertile due to absence of the Vas deferens (CBAVD). Whether this is a "symptomatic carrier" or actually has CF but they have not found a second mutation is unknown. but their OB doctor isn't incorrect about this. It is a possibility.
Bignana, they should look into doing IVF with PGD. Some insurance companies will cover it (after an appeal) when presented with the cost/risk/% of having a baby with CF versus the cost of IVF with PGD to prevent a CF baby.
Actually un-true, quite a number of men who are CF <u>carriers</u> ARE infertile due to absence of the Vas deferens (CBAVD). Whether this is a "symptomatic carrier" or actually has CF but they have not found a second mutation is unknown. but their OB doctor isn't incorrect about this. It is a possibility.
Bignana, they should look into doing IVF with PGD. Some insurance companies will cover it (after an appeal) when presented with the cost/risk/% of having a baby with CF versus the cost of IVF with PGD to prevent a CF baby.
Actually un-true, quite a number of men who are CF <u>carriers</u> ARE infertile due to absence of the Vas deferens (CBAVD). Whether this is a "symptomatic carrier" or actually has CF but they have not found a second mutation is unknown. but their OB doctor isn't incorrect about this. It is a possibility.
Bignana, they should look into doing IVF with PGD. Some insurance companies will cover it (after an appeal) when presented with the cost/risk/% of having a baby with CF versus the cost of IVF with PGD to prevent a CF baby.
Actually un-true, quite a number of men who are CF <u>carriers</u> ARE infertile due to absence of the Vas deferens (CBAVD). Whether this is a "symptomatic carrier" or actually has CF but they have not found a second mutation is unknown. but their OB doctor isn't incorrect about this. It is a possibility.
<br />
<br />Bignana, they should look into doing IVF with PGD. Some insurance companies will cover it (after an appeal) when presented with the cost/risk/% of having a baby with CF versus the cost of IVF with PGD to prevent a CF baby.
I haven't read all the replys but I just wanted to say that if my husband had known we were both carriers we would have gone through IVF. We never would of taken the the 1 in 4 chance of a child having CF had we known better. Not that there is anything wrong with having a CF child it just is better to avoid it all together. My kids have normal lives but they do a lot of maintenace.
I haven't read all the replys but I just wanted to say that if my husband had known we were both carriers we would have gone through IVF. We never would of taken the the 1 in 4 chance of a child having CF had we known better. Not that there is anything wrong with having a CF child it just is better to avoid it all together. My kids have normal lives but they do a lot of maintenace.
I haven't read all the replys but I just wanted to say that if my husband had known we were both carriers we would have gone through IVF. We never would of taken the the 1 in 4 chance of a child having CF had we known better. Not that there is anything wrong with having a CF child it just is better to avoid it all together. My kids have normal lives but they do a lot of maintenace.
I haven't read all the replys but I just wanted to say that if my husband had known we were both carriers we would have gone through IVF. We never would of taken the the 1 in 4 chance of a child having CF had we known better. Not that there is anything wrong with having a CF child it just is better to avoid it all together. My kids have normal lives but they do a lot of maintenace.
I haven't read all the replys but I just wanted to say that if my husband had known we were both carriers we would have gone through IVF. We never would of taken the the 1 in 4 chance of a child having CF had we known better. Not that there is anything wrong with having a CF child it just is better to avoid it all together. My kids have normal lives but they do a lot of maintenace.
Hi, my husband and I are both DF508 carriers. We have one child w/CF. No one else in either of our families had CF. We looked into IVF for our second child, and adoption, but have now decided that IUI w/donor sperm is right for us. One child w/CF is hard work...and stressful. I would definitely advise your daughter/son-in-law to do a lot of research before deciding what is right for them.
Hi, my husband and I are both DF508 carriers. We have one child w/CF. No one else in either of our families had CF. We looked into IVF for our second child, and adoption, but have now decided that IUI w/donor sperm is right for us. One child w/CF is hard work...and stressful. I would definitely advise your daughter/son-in-law to do a lot of research before deciding what is right for them.
Hi, my husband and I are both DF508 carriers. We have one child w/CF. No one else in either of our families had CF. We looked into IVF for our second child, and adoption, but have now decided that IUI w/donor sperm is right for us. One child w/CF is hard work...and stressful. I would definitely advise your daughter/son-in-law to do a lot of research before deciding what is right for them.
Hi, my husband and I are both DF508 carriers. We have one child w/CF. No one else in either of our families had CF. We looked into IVF for our second child, and adoption, but have now decided that IUI w/donor sperm is right for us. One child w/CF is hard work...and stressful. I would definitely advise your daughter/son-in-law to do a lot of research before deciding what is right for them.
Hi, my husband and I are both DF508 carriers. We have one child w/CF. No one else in either of our families had CF. We looked into IVF for our second child, and adoption, but have now decided that IUI w/donor sperm is right for us. One child w/CF is hard work...and stressful. I would definitely advise your daughter/son-in-law to do a lot of research before deciding what is right for them.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.