jdprecious
New member
My younger sister found out a few months back that she is a carrier of the DF508 gene (as am I)and she is about 6 months pregnant with her first child. The doctor/insurance company refused to test her husband for the CF genes even though there is a history of CF on our side of the family (Jaelyn).
So, now that she has gone further into her pregnancy, certain things are bothering me that don't seem to be bothering ANYONE else. The major thing is that her sodium levels are low. Well, we all know that CF is a sodium deficiency but the doctor is stating that her sodium levels were low when she went into the navy about 3 yrs ago. For me, the very first thing I would do in a pregnant mother with a history of CF in the family is to test the husband or do an amniocentesis just to rule out the possibility. Her doc keeps saying that all this is unnecessary which is driving me batty.
I msg'd my sister back and said its only necessary if you want the facts BEFORE the baby gets here instead of after. I feel like I'm raining on her parade with all the CF talk when all her doctor does is dismiss it. But what kind of sister would I be if I didn't tell her the possibilities??? I just don't know what to do.
I feel like as a new mother you have the right to know at any time during the pregnancy, not just after the baby is born. Plus, how much better prepared would I have been had I known that Jaelyn had CF while preggo instead of spending three long years and thousands of dollars on quack doctors who would never diagnose her.
So, I guess my question is: When you were pregnant with your CF'er did you have low sodium levels and what led them to dx the baby in utero?
So, now that she has gone further into her pregnancy, certain things are bothering me that don't seem to be bothering ANYONE else. The major thing is that her sodium levels are low. Well, we all know that CF is a sodium deficiency but the doctor is stating that her sodium levels were low when she went into the navy about 3 yrs ago. For me, the very first thing I would do in a pregnant mother with a history of CF in the family is to test the husband or do an amniocentesis just to rule out the possibility. Her doc keeps saying that all this is unnecessary which is driving me batty.
I msg'd my sister back and said its only necessary if you want the facts BEFORE the baby gets here instead of after. I feel like I'm raining on her parade with all the CF talk when all her doctor does is dismiss it. But what kind of sister would I be if I didn't tell her the possibilities??? I just don't know what to do.
I feel like as a new mother you have the right to know at any time during the pregnancy, not just after the baby is born. Plus, how much better prepared would I have been had I known that Jaelyn had CF while preggo instead of spending three long years and thousands of dollars on quack doctors who would never diagnose her.
So, I guess my question is: When you were pregnant with your CF'er did you have low sodium levels and what led them to dx the baby in utero?