<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>princessjdc</b></i>
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Debi</b></i>
And, do you guys get that if you have cf and have a kid there's a pretty big chance your kid will have cf? Do you really need the birthing experience bad enough that you're willing to make a little person go through cf hell??
</end quote></div>
Im confused now, so according to Debi's daughter, if I have a child then my child could possibly have cf even though my husband is not a carrier? <img src="">
I always thought that if your spouse is a carrier then your kid has a chance of being a carrier or have cf and if the spouse is not a carrier then the kid can only be a carrier or no carrier at all. Am i understanding this wrong? Will someone straighten this out for me.</end quote></div>
If your husband is not a carrier (usually they can do a 99% accurate genetics test for this, but since there are unidentified strains of CF, it is still possible) the child WILL for sure be a carrier of the CF gene as he/she inherits it from you (you have 2 CF genes and that is why you ended up with CF). Your husband, since he does NOT have CF would only have one to contribute, meaning if he's NOT a carrier of any CF genes, the baby would only be a carrier of one of your CF genes (since you only contribute one.) If, in fact your husband IS a carrier of the CF gene (in the unlikely event he has an "undiscovered gene", the baby still has only a 50% chance of getting it. This is because you will still contribute your one gene, and you have a 50/50 chance that he contributes the CF gene. 2 CF genes would make a CF baby. Make more sense?
My husband is not a carrier, so the likelihood of our baby having CF would be like .8-.9% based on the event that one of the "unidentified CF genes" is passed on from him. I think some genetics tests test for more genes, while others only test for the most common. So, it is important to get the most comprehensive test possible to decrease your "risk" of a false negative. Make sense?
Gosh, I hate genetics. <img src="">