Here's a comment left on my blog responding to my post....What do you guys think? How would you answer?
"Soooo, just to play devil's advocate...
Let's say someone invented a vaccine for something annoying, but fairly harmless... roseola, for instance. But the vaccine also carried a 25% chance of causing CF. (I know that's not medically possible, just a hypothetical.) Would you give it to your newborn? What if there was a 50% chance? 100%?
My guess is that most people wouldn't even consider giving their kid a vaccine for a fairly harmless disease if there was a 25% chance of causing a serious illness instead. Maybe I am off on my guess though.
It's just an analogy... but still. Seems the outcome is the same. In choosing to have another child, you would be taking a 25% chance in creating a child with CF. Or in giving the hypothetical vaccine, the same 25% chance of creating CF.
It's interesting to me that a lot of the comments seem to touch on that having CF doesn't mean you can't be happy, that we should just leave it up to God, that tragedy could happen to anyone, that we love our kids no matter what disease they might have, etc. Which are all true, but seem to me to be incidental to the question.
I'm curious what the motivation is, for those who said they would choose to have kids, even with the 25% chance. Is it the internal drive to have your own biological kids? Is it that 25% isn't a high enough chance? Is it that you think CF isn't that big of a deal? Honestly, I am curious... why take the chance?"
I'd love to hear your response...you can also see all of the other comments at https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8121963203914214070&postID=1637367927530098130