What's new
Cystic Fibrosis Forum (EXP)

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stem Cell Research Veto

AnD

New member
I found this on cordblood.com

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>The ability of cord blood stem cells to differentiate, or change into other types of cells in the body is a new discovery that holds significant promise for improving the treatment of some of the most common diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's.</end quote></div>


Apparently, from what I've read, there have been better rates of sucessful adult and cord blood stem cell treatment, with less risk of tumors and rejection than with embryonic cells.

I hope that helps the cord blood question <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> .
 

AnD

New member
I found this on cordblood.com

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>The ability of cord blood stem cells to differentiate, or change into other types of cells in the body is a new discovery that holds significant promise for improving the treatment of some of the most common diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's.</end quote></div>


Apparently, from what I've read, there have been better rates of sucessful adult and cord blood stem cell treatment, with less risk of tumors and rejection than with embryonic cells.

I hope that helps the cord blood question <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> .
 

AnD

New member
I found this on cordblood.com

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>The ability of cord blood stem cells to differentiate, or change into other types of cells in the body is a new discovery that holds significant promise for improving the treatment of some of the most common diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's.</end quote></div>


Apparently, from what I've read, there have been better rates of sucessful adult and cord blood stem cell treatment, with less risk of tumors and rejection than with embryonic cells.

I hope that helps the cord blood question <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> .
 

AnD

New member
I found this on cordblood.com

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>The ability of cord blood stem cells to differentiate, or change into other types of cells in the body is a new discovery that holds significant promise for improving the treatment of some of the most common diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's.</end quote></div>


Apparently, from what I've read, there have been better rates of sucessful adult and cord blood stem cell treatment, with less risk of tumors and rejection than with embryonic cells.

I hope that helps the cord blood question <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> .
 

AnD

New member
I found this on cordblood.com

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>The ability of cord blood stem cells to differentiate, or change into other types of cells in the body is a new discovery that holds significant promise for improving the treatment of some of the most common diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's.</end quote>


Apparently, from what I've read, there have been better rates of sucessful adult and cord blood stem cell treatment, with less risk of tumors and rejection than with embryonic cells.

I hope that helps the cord blood question <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> .
 

AnD

New member
I found this on cordblood.com

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>The ability of cord blood stem cells to differentiate, or change into other types of cells in the body is a new discovery that holds significant promise for improving the treatment of some of the most common diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and Alzheimer's.</end quote>


Apparently, from what I've read, there have been better rates of sucessful adult and cord blood stem cell treatment, with less risk of tumors and rejection than with embryonic cells.

I hope that helps the cord blood question <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> .
 

NoExcuses

New member
well sure they say that - they make more money if people believe that.

i think others may argue differently about success rates.....
 

NoExcuses

New member
well sure they say that - they make more money if people believe that.

i think others may argue differently about success rates.....
 

NoExcuses

New member
well sure they say that - they make more money if people believe that.

i think others may argue differently about success rates.....
 

NoExcuses

New member
well sure they say that - they make more money if people believe that.

i think others may argue differently about success rates.....
 

NoExcuses

New member
well sure they say that - they make more money if people believe that.

i think others may argue differently about success rates.....
 

NoExcuses

New member
well sure they say that - they make more money if people believe that.

i think others may argue differently about success rates.....
 

SEANP

New member
Hi,
Here is a link to a Mayo Clinic article that I think is good and is recent. As someone wrote above, no there have been no cures from embryonic stem cell treatments as of yet, but the technology is 20-30 years behind adult stem cell work. I believe it does hold promise. Each of us has to decide if these early cells constitute life. I am inclined to think not, because of the early stage in development. I do not equate this with "killing babies". That is just my opinion though.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stem-cells/CA00081
 

SEANP

New member
Hi,
Here is a link to a Mayo Clinic article that I think is good and is recent. As someone wrote above, no there have been no cures from embryonic stem cell treatments as of yet, but the technology is 20-30 years behind adult stem cell work. I believe it does hold promise. Each of us has to decide if these early cells constitute life. I am inclined to think not, because of the early stage in development. I do not equate this with "killing babies". That is just my opinion though.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stem-cells/CA00081
 

SEANP

New member
Hi,
Here is a link to a Mayo Clinic article that I think is good and is recent. As someone wrote above, no there have been no cures from embryonic stem cell treatments as of yet, but the technology is 20-30 years behind adult stem cell work. I believe it does hold promise. Each of us has to decide if these early cells constitute life. I am inclined to think not, because of the early stage in development. I do not equate this with "killing babies". That is just my opinion though.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stem-cells/CA00081
 

SEANP

New member
Hi,
Here is a link to a Mayo Clinic article that I think is good and is recent. As someone wrote above, no there have been no cures from embryonic stem cell treatments as of yet, but the technology is 20-30 years behind adult stem cell work. I believe it does hold promise. Each of us has to decide if these early cells constitute life. I am inclined to think not, because of the early stage in development. I do not equate this with "killing babies". That is just my opinion though.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stem-cells/CA00081
 

SEANP

New member
Hi,
Here is a link to a Mayo Clinic article that I think is good and is recent. As someone wrote above, no there have been no cures from embryonic stem cell treatments as of yet, but the technology is 20-30 years behind adult stem cell work. I believe it does hold promise. Each of us has to decide if these early cells constitute life. I am inclined to think not, because of the early stage in development. I do not equate this with "killing babies". That is just my opinion though.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stem-cells/CA00081
 

SEANP

New member
Hi,
Here is a link to a Mayo Clinic article that I think is good and is recent. As someone wrote above, no there have been no cures from embryonic stem cell treatments as of yet, but the technology is 20-30 years behind adult stem cell work. I believe it does hold promise. Each of us has to decide if these early cells constitute life. I am inclined to think not, because of the early stage in development. I do not equate this with "killing babies". That is just my opinion though.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stem-cells/CA00081
 
Top