What's new
By:
Filters
Cystic Fibrosis Forum (EXP)

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Study demonstrates lack of CF symptoms doesn't mean there isn't damanage

M

Mommafirst

Guest
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

ya i'm surprised the study wasn't published until this April in the American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Med. 2009 Apr 16

</end quote></div>


Academics -- even medical academics -- move pretty slowly. This isn't a terrible turnaround from conference to publication...

Anyway, thanks for posting this. It is very interesting.

We have been aggresive since my daughter was diagnosed. She cultures small amounts of staph but a bronch showed no lung involvement (words were her docs). I'm going to send him this article . . . possibly he should rethink the wording he uses. Maybe he should say no lung damage and no current VISIBLE signs of involvment.

Regardless, we'll continue to stay highly aggressive.
 
M

Mommafirst

Guest
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

ya i'm surprised the study wasn't published until this April in the American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Med. 2009 Apr 16

</end quote></div>


Academics -- even medical academics -- move pretty slowly. This isn't a terrible turnaround from conference to publication...

Anyway, thanks for posting this. It is very interesting.

We have been aggresive since my daughter was diagnosed. She cultures small amounts of staph but a bronch showed no lung involvement (words were her docs). I'm going to send him this article . . . possibly he should rethink the wording he uses. Maybe he should say no lung damage and no current VISIBLE signs of involvment.

Regardless, we'll continue to stay highly aggressive.
 
M

Mommafirst

Guest
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

ya i'm surprised the study wasn't published until this April in the American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Med. 2009 Apr 16

</end quote></div>


Academics -- even medical academics -- move pretty slowly. This isn't a terrible turnaround from conference to publication...

Anyway, thanks for posting this. It is very interesting.

We have been aggresive since my daughter was diagnosed. She cultures small amounts of staph but a bronch showed no lung involvement (words were her docs). I'm going to send him this article . . . possibly he should rethink the wording he uses. Maybe he should say no lung damage and no current VISIBLE signs of involvment.

Regardless, we'll continue to stay highly aggressive.
 
M

Mommafirst

Guest
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

ya i'm surprised the study wasn't published until this April in the American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Med. 2009 Apr 16

</end quote>


Academics -- even medical academics -- move pretty slowly. This isn't a terrible turnaround from conference to publication...

Anyway, thanks for posting this. It is very interesting.

We have been aggresive since my daughter was diagnosed. She cultures small amounts of staph but a bronch showed no lung involvement (words were her docs). I'm going to send him this article . . . possibly he should rethink the wording he uses. Maybe he should say no lung damage and no current VISIBLE signs of involvment.

Regardless, we'll continue to stay highly aggressive.
 
M

Mommafirst

Guest
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>
<br />
<br />ya i'm surprised the study wasn't published until this April in the American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Med. 2009 Apr 16
<br />
<br /></end quote>
<br />
<br />
<br />Academics -- even medical academics -- move pretty slowly. This isn't a terrible turnaround from conference to publication...
<br />
<br />Anyway, thanks for posting this. It is very interesting.
<br />
<br />We have been aggresive since my daughter was diagnosed. She cultures small amounts of staph but a bronch showed no lung involvement (words were her docs). I'm going to send him this article . . . possibly he should rethink the wording he uses. Maybe he should say no lung damage and no current VISIBLE signs of involvment.
<br />
<br />Regardless, we'll continue to stay highly aggressive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top