What's new
Cystic Fibrosis Forum (EXP)

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sweat Test

hmw

New member
A panel tests for a certain selection of mutations (i.e. your husband was tested for X number of mutations. The test did not look for any other mutations outside of that pre-selected assortment of mutations.) So this can be a problem sometimes: Someone can have a mutation not on that list, but and the test will not identify it, thus giving you a 'normal' result.

Having the gene sequenced means that rather than looking for specific mutations, the gene itself is examined/sequenced for ANY kind of mutation. This is how an ever-increasing number of mutations is identified; well over 1,500 to date. One that is 'relatively' common could be discovered during this process, or one could be discovered that is completely new, never before seen. You just don't know until it's done. And having the part done that looks for deletions and duplications will find stuff that no other mutation test out there to date (that I know of) will find. This test cannot give you a 100% guarantee either, but odds of a false negative result are MUCH lower than with a panel test.
 

hmw

New member
A panel tests for a certain selection of mutations (i.e. your husband was tested for X number of mutations. The test did not look for any other mutations outside of that pre-selected assortment of mutations.) So this can be a problem sometimes: Someone can have a mutation not on that list, but and the test will not identify it, thus giving you a 'normal' result.

Having the gene sequenced means that rather than looking for specific mutations, the gene itself is examined/sequenced for ANY kind of mutation. This is how an ever-increasing number of mutations is identified; well over 1,500 to date. One that is 'relatively' common could be discovered during this process, or one could be discovered that is completely new, never before seen. You just don't know until it's done. And having the part done that looks for deletions and duplications will find stuff that no other mutation test out there to date (that I know of) will find. This test cannot give you a 100% guarantee either, but odds of a false negative result are MUCH lower than with a panel test.
 

hmw

New member
A panel tests for a certain selection of mutations (i.e. your husband was tested for X number of mutations. The test did not look for any other mutations outside of that pre-selected assortment of mutations.) So this can be a problem sometimes: Someone can have a mutation not on that list, but and the test will not identify it, thus giving you a 'normal' result.

Having the gene sequenced means that rather than looking for specific mutations, the gene itself is examined/sequenced for ANY kind of mutation. This is how an ever-increasing number of mutations is identified; well over 1,500 to date. One that is 'relatively' common could be discovered during this process, or one could be discovered that is completely new, never before seen. You just don't know until it's done. And having the part done that looks for deletions and duplications will find stuff that no other mutation test out there to date (that I know of) will find. This test cannot give you a 100% guarantee either, but odds of a false negative result are MUCH lower than with a panel test.
 

hmw

New member
A panel tests for a certain selection of mutations (i.e. your husband was tested for X number of mutations. The test did not look for any other mutations outside of that pre-selected assortment of mutations.) So this can be a problem sometimes: Someone can have a mutation not on that list, but and the test will not identify it, thus giving you a 'normal' result.

Having the gene sequenced means that rather than looking for specific mutations, the gene itself is examined/sequenced for ANY kind of mutation. This is how an ever-increasing number of mutations is identified; well over 1,500 to date. One that is 'relatively' common could be discovered during this process, or one could be discovered that is completely new, never before seen. You just don't know until it's done. And having the part done that looks for deletions and duplications will find stuff that no other mutation test out there to date (that I know of) will find. This test cannot give you a 100% guarantee either, but odds of a false negative result are MUCH lower than with a panel test.
 

hmw

New member
A panel tests for a certain selection of mutations (i.e. your husband was tested for X number of mutations. The test did not look for any other mutations outside of that pre-selected assortment of mutations.) So this can be a problem sometimes: Someone can have a mutation not on that list, but and the test will not identify it, thus giving you a 'normal' result.
<br />
<br />Having the gene sequenced means that rather than looking for specific mutations, the gene itself is examined/sequenced for ANY kind of mutation. This is how an ever-increasing number of mutations is identified; well over 1,500 to date. One that is 'relatively' common could be discovered during this process, or one could be discovered that is completely new, never before seen. You just don't know until it's done. And having the part done that looks for deletions and duplications will find stuff that no other mutation test out there to date (that I know of) will find. This test cannot give you a 100% guarantee either, but odds of a false negative result are MUCH lower than with a panel test.
 

jdubbs

New member
I wouldn't be surprised if having just one CF allele would cause the problems you are describing. The sweat test can be ambiguous as far as I can tell, as can panel testing since there are rare unmapped CF alleles out there. IF they already paneled your husband and he was negative, it seems pointless to panel your son. So, I guess sequencing seems like the thing to do, if you can swing it.
 

jdubbs

New member
I wouldn't be surprised if having just one CF allele would cause the problems you are describing. The sweat test can be ambiguous as far as I can tell, as can panel testing since there are rare unmapped CF alleles out there. IF they already paneled your husband and he was negative, it seems pointless to panel your son. So, I guess sequencing seems like the thing to do, if you can swing it.
 

jdubbs

New member
I wouldn't be surprised if having just one CF allele would cause the problems you are describing. The sweat test can be ambiguous as far as I can tell, as can panel testing since there are rare unmapped CF alleles out there. IF they already paneled your husband and he was negative, it seems pointless to panel your son. So, I guess sequencing seems like the thing to do, if you can swing it.
 

jdubbs

New member
I wouldn't be surprised if having just one CF allele would cause the problems you are describing. The sweat test can be ambiguous as far as I can tell, as can panel testing since there are rare unmapped CF alleles out there. IF they already paneled your husband and he was negative, it seems pointless to panel your son. So, I guess sequencing seems like the thing to do, if you can swing it.
 

jdubbs

New member
I wouldn't be surprised if having just one CF allele would cause the problems you are describing. The sweat test can be ambiguous as far as I can tell, as can panel testing since there are rare unmapped CF alleles out there. IF they already paneled your husband and he was negative, it seems pointless to panel your son. So, I guess sequencing seems like the thing to do, if you can swing it.
 

Jeana

New member
Thanks, guys! At least I feel like I will be going in to the CF doc armed with info that can hopefully convince him to get the sequencing done. I really need the assurance one way or the other. Thanks for all the support. You guys are the best!
 

Jeana

New member
Thanks, guys! At least I feel like I will be going in to the CF doc armed with info that can hopefully convince him to get the sequencing done. I really need the assurance one way or the other. Thanks for all the support. You guys are the best!
 

Jeana

New member
Thanks, guys! At least I feel like I will be going in to the CF doc armed with info that can hopefully convince him to get the sequencing done. I really need the assurance one way or the other. Thanks for all the support. You guys are the best!
 

Jeana

New member
Thanks, guys! At least I feel like I will be going in to the CF doc armed with info that can hopefully convince him to get the sequencing done. I really need the assurance one way or the other. Thanks for all the support. You guys are the best!
 

Jeana

New member
Thanks, guys! At least I feel like I will be going in to the CF doc armed with info that can hopefully convince him to get the sequencing done. I really need the assurance one way or the other. Thanks for all the support. You guys are the best!
 

Cerulean

New member
Back before there was genetic testing I was given the sweat test 3 times before there was a definitive dx. First time was negative, second time positive, and to find out which was correct a third time came out positive.

I'm not sure if this is correct but, I presented only a mild form of CF through most of my life. Perhaps this is why my tests were all screwed up. Not sure though.
 

Cerulean

New member
Back before there was genetic testing I was given the sweat test 3 times before there was a definitive dx. First time was negative, second time positive, and to find out which was correct a third time came out positive.

I'm not sure if this is correct but, I presented only a mild form of CF through most of my life. Perhaps this is why my tests were all screwed up. Not sure though.
 

Cerulean

New member
Back before there was genetic testing I was given the sweat test 3 times before there was a definitive dx. First time was negative, second time positive, and to find out which was correct a third time came out positive.

I'm not sure if this is correct but, I presented only a mild form of CF through most of my life. Perhaps this is why my tests were all screwed up. Not sure though.
 

Cerulean

New member
Back before there was genetic testing I was given the sweat test 3 times before there was a definitive dx. First time was negative, second time positive, and to find out which was correct a third time came out positive.

I'm not sure if this is correct but, I presented only a mild form of CF through most of my life. Perhaps this is why my tests were all screwed up. Not sure though.
 

Cerulean

New member
Back before there was genetic testing I was given the sweat test 3 times before there was a definitive dx. First time was negative, second time positive, and to find out which was correct a third time came out positive.
<br />
<br />I'm not sure if this is correct but, I presented only a mild form of CF through most of my life. Perhaps this is why my tests were all screwed up. Not sure though.
 
Top