<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>amy</b></i>
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Ender</b></i>
.</end quote></div>
Amy, proof of how all the cf devices work is undeniable, and there are studies saying that no one device is significantly better than any other.
</end quote></div>
can you show me these studies?</end quote></div>
Arens R, Gozal D, Omlin KJ, Vega J, Boyd KP, Keens TG, Woo MS. Comparison of high-frequency chest compression and conventional chest physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:1154-7.
A study of 50 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary exacerbation who were randomized to receive either conventional chest physiotherapy or high-frequency chest compression (HFCC) reveals significant improvements in pulmonary function and clinical status in both groups and no significant differences between the two. The authors speculate that HFCC may provide an adequate alternative in management of patients with CF in a hospital setting
That's one study. There are a bunch like that on the vest research page linked above. However, there are also some that say the vest is a bit better. To me though, it is pretty hazy. And at 20 to 30 thousand dollars....I just don't see the benefit?
Is medicaid the same as HMO? Why is there such an evil bias on HMO's then giving the cheapest care possible?
And no if you aren't insured and go to the er, you won't be turned away, you'll just get a bill for a couple of thousand dollars.
However, i would just like to note that they are implementing in a few provinces clinics where you can get hip replacements and other necassary surgeries faster for a price. They're calling it the two tiered system.
I dunno, i always loved canada for it's medical care, but it sounds like in the states it's just as easy to get coverage, so why doesn't everyone just go private.
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Ender</b></i>
.</end quote></div>
Amy, proof of how all the cf devices work is undeniable, and there are studies saying that no one device is significantly better than any other.
</end quote></div>
can you show me these studies?</end quote></div>
Arens R, Gozal D, Omlin KJ, Vega J, Boyd KP, Keens TG, Woo MS. Comparison of high-frequency chest compression and conventional chest physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:1154-7.
A study of 50 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary exacerbation who were randomized to receive either conventional chest physiotherapy or high-frequency chest compression (HFCC) reveals significant improvements in pulmonary function and clinical status in both groups and no significant differences between the two. The authors speculate that HFCC may provide an adequate alternative in management of patients with CF in a hospital setting
That's one study. There are a bunch like that on the vest research page linked above. However, there are also some that say the vest is a bit better. To me though, it is pretty hazy. And at 20 to 30 thousand dollars....I just don't see the benefit?
Is medicaid the same as HMO? Why is there such an evil bias on HMO's then giving the cheapest care possible?
And no if you aren't insured and go to the er, you won't be turned away, you'll just get a bill for a couple of thousand dollars.
However, i would just like to note that they are implementing in a few provinces clinics where you can get hip replacements and other necassary surgeries faster for a price. They're calling it the two tiered system.
I dunno, i always loved canada for it's medical care, but it sounds like in the states it's just as easy to get coverage, so why doesn't everyone just go private.