What's new
Cystic Fibrosis Forum (EXP)

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

meaning in it all

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Seana30</b></i>

To the Joe Pesci guy..............



I just have to say....get some original material!



If any of ya'll have watched George Carlin's, WE ARE ALL DISEASED that is exactly what he says in his act.



Seana</end quote></div>


I appreciate you pointing out the obvious. Do you often tell people that drive with you, while passing stop signs, that they are red as well? Yes, the rest of us have cable as well. I know you tend to gravitate towards starting drama in general, but please let us have the occasional drama free thread where we get to have civil conversations and not start attacking each other. It is quite refreshing. Next time someone has the need to say something they enjoy that was at one time said by someone else, for the sake of comicical direction, I will make sure they PM you for for permission and the all important recapitulation.
 

anonymous

New member
"I'm not sure if they are getting smaller, but when you look, you can see the remnants of a small tail we used to once have.

The tonsils and the appendix are strutures that we have but aren't really useful anymore, or we can live without. I'mnot sure if they will go away or not, but you know how it is with evolution, if it's not functional, then it's done away with."


What he/she said. The appendix, the tonsils, and our tailbone (I'm sure there are probably several others if I wasn't too lazy to look, but those are the more well known ones) are all remnants of parts of us that are no longer used/useful and are slowly shrinking/going away. Every generation or three or five our appendix gets more of a burden than anything else, hence why we can remove it and we lose nothing. If I remember right scientists felt our appendix served to help digest raw meat. We haven't been eating raw meat in a very long time (since we have incorporated fire to cook with), so after a long time of not using something in the human body, via passing down genetic information, it becomes more and more useless and starts to go away. The same works in reverse, with some organism who has a random mutation that leads to it surviving past those who don't have the mutation, it passes on it's genetic code and the next generation of organisms under that organism in turn have that mutation and continue to thrive like it's ancestor.


We used to have a tail, hence why we now have tial bones. We started walking erect, either from descending from the trees or walking on land from the water (something I agree with more than the simian approach), and over time it also became more and more useless, and since it has had a lot more time to be useless, there is much less of it around. The terms "Shake your tail feather", or "His tailbone" are called that for a reason. Tonsils are also the same. They once served some purpose, but now it's very routine to just have them removed at the slightest sign of trouble, and a child won't need them anymore, because the human body due to evolution doesn't need them anymore.


This is why when people who absolutely refuse to believe in evolution freak out and get all pissy, it just makes me wonder. It is currently taking place in our own bodies as we speak. Australia and the Gallopagos Islands are perfect more modern day examples. There is an actual equation for evolution, that generally determines if it should or shouldnt heavily take place. Sometime like Time (this is vague) +/- isolation +/- preadtor +/- population and blah blah blah = stark evolutionary change, or no stark quick change.


Theres a reason why there are only Kangaroos in Australia. BTW, there are currently Fish in Miami that quite literally "walk" out of bodies of water when their populations of male fish get too high. They walk on land (via evolutionary adaptation to breath regular air for extended periods of time) to other hopefully near by bodies of water to repopulate those. The fish who make it are rewarded with passing on their genes, and hence how those strong traits are passed on.


It doesn't matter to me who or what made evolution take place, but it is here, and is as real as my right hand and my front door, and much more predictable.
 

anonymous

New member
BTW Cystic Fibrosis could also be considered a form of evolution. Somewhere along the line there was a random mutation, and this random mutations genetic code was passed on. By now it's deeply seeded within humans DNA, as in the carrier or non carrier aspect. Not all random mutations are good or successful. If you have 100,000,000 new born babies, eventually one will be born with 3 or 4 arms (like recently). Out of enough of those 3 or 4 armed babies, with different random mutations to get those 3 or 4 arms, one of those mutations will be of a utilitarian nature that means one arms won't just be useless. That baby will grow up (this is speculative of course) to have 3 or 4 fully functioning arms (speaking probability wise), pass on that mutation, and then down the line more will have to follow.


I would love to study CF more genetically, especially regionally. My knowledge on that aspect of it is cursory at best.
 

Seana30

New member
appreciate you pointing out the obvious. Do you often tell people that drive with you, while passing stop signs, that they are red as well? Yes, the rest of us have cable as well. I know you tend to gravitate towards starting drama in general, but please let us have the occasional drama free thread where we get to have civil conversations and not start attacking each other. It is quite refreshing. Next time someone has the need to say something they enjoy that was at one time said by someone else, for the sake of comicical direction, I will make sure they PM you for for permission and the all important recapitulation

LOL.....WELCOME BACK SEAND!!

Seana
 

Seana30

New member
I wanted to make a quick reply on the discussion on appendix and tonsils.

My 11 year old son has had them both removed.

They told me this after his surgery, and it's not like we had a choice in removing his appendix, but................

After having your appendix removed you have a 5 times more likely chance of getting non hogkins lymphoma.

So maybe we do need these organs which are called "not useable" and we just dont know it. Food for thought!

Seana
 

Ender

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Seana30</b></i>

I wanted to make a quick reply on the discussion on appendix and tonsils.



My 11 year old son has had them both removed.



They told me this after his surgery, and it's not like we had a choice in removing his appendix, but................



After having your appendix removed you have a 5 times more likely chance of getting non hogkins lymphoma.



So maybe we do need these organs which are called "not useable" and we just dont know it. Food for thought!



Seana</end quote></div>

Interesting. As we can live without them, perhaps we aren't ready for it yet.

More on evolution. If you are to take an xray of all mammals hands, you will see the same bone structure similar in all of the animals. Bats, humans, monkeys, we all have homologous bones structures with similar patterns in all related limbs.

If you look at all fetuses, you can also see the presence of gills, and a tail. This is common in all species, going back to the time that we lived in the water (hence their theory that we came from the ocean)

I can go on and on, but the above poster that said cf was a mutation, he was right. They have found that people are a lot more resistant to cholera, and that is why the mutation is quite abundant.
 

anonymous

New member
I've never really bought into the whole evolution thing. It could be true but it's just theory to me, just as God forming the earth and everything on it in 6 days is theory to others.
I guess I wonder if evolution is real, then what next??? wings? giant sized humans? eventually no body hair at all?
Just things to ponder.
Lynda
not signed in
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Seana30</b></i>

I wanted to make a quick reply on the discussion on appendix and tonsils.



My 11 year old son has had them both removed.



They told me this after his surgery, and it's not like we had a choice in removing his appendix, but................



After having your appendix removed you have a 5 times more likely chance of getting non hogkins lymphoma.



So maybe we do need these organs which are called "not useable" and we just dont know it. Food for thought!



Seana</end quote></div>



I would really need to see something on that to comment, but (and I do scour the internet and many forms of research regarding disease) who knows. Just because things are removed due to their perceived uselessness, means they are fully ready to be removed from the perspective by the overseeing organism.

I actually looked into your comments, googled up several variations about what you just said, and came up with some extremely pro creationist links. As I have said in the past, I have zero interest if evolutionism was made by "God", or nature, or whatever. All we know as human beings is that it 100% exists. Not only can we view the gradual decline in our vestigual organs/appendages as proof for this, but countless (and I mean tons) in field studies to prove the point, that evolution not only is real, but takes place around us regardless if we want to accept it or not. About 5 years ago there was an article on how evolution was identified to be taking place within 15 years (15 YEARS!) within some very basic worm. This was done by some of the most prestigious universities that humans go to. A lifeform had literally proved to have changed via evolution within 15 years. It was one way before 15 years (I think the article stipulated it was last observed 16 years previously), and then had a stark biological and genetic difference 15 years later when it was next observed).


As I said, as per "My son had his tonsils and appendex removed, and my doctor said this gave him 5 times the chanes of acquiring hodgins lymphoma"...Well...I have also had doctors tell me all kinds of things. I will listen to everything, but something of that type of insinuative magnitude needs to be substantiated in a scientific/medicinal way for it to be valued beyond anything other than opinion.


If we want to go by that alone, I have personally know around 11 humans (closely and acquintance) who have all had their tonsils and appendix removed. None of them had Hodgkins Lymphoma, or any other extreme health malady for that measure.


My point is, and always has been. By saying "vestigial", doesn't mean the organ, or appendage is 100% useless to us anymore (as per the link I will post later, that is extremely pro creationism), it just means that evolution, is proven, and takes place all around us, within our bodies, in our environement, and in a stark way on isolated areas. Now if "God" made it so, I have no idea. I have no problem with there being a central power to the universe. I just think if "it" exists, it doesn't care about order in any sense. It's like a giant battery fueling everything else, and it just always was there, for whatever reason, who knows.

I am tired. I have crap to do tomorrow. The link I will post is of course extremely biased. So much so, at times, the information therein is razor close to ignorance, if not fully subscribed to. Just because someone has a doctorate before their name, doesn't mean they can't/won't allow their personal prejudices to overshadow real science, and reality. Particular interest to me was him discussing the Coccyx point. On how there are still human muscles attached to the "tail bone", which helps us walk, relieve ourselves, and help us pee.

No scientist that I know of(And I know quite a few), would argue the point (pro evolution) that the human body has been able to find an effecient, total way of ridding itself of a "vestigial organ", or "vestigial appendage" within itself in such a way, where other muscularskeletar systems still didn't rely upon it. To be vague, I technically "don't need" my pinky finger on my left hand. If I wanted to be more efficient with saving 20% on gloves guaged by value on their fingers in the future, I could cut this off. Guess what? While it was still technically a "Vestigal appendage", as in openly debateably "useless", I still have tendons, muscles, fat, skin, tissue, sinue, etc etc attached to it. That doesn't make it anymore useful just because the rest of my body is attached to it.


Some arguments are just flat out ignorant. This isn't about believing in god, or not believing in god. It's about being educated, and atleast getting through seventh grade anatomy/biology. To me nothing is wrong with "god" giving us all the foundations for life to start, flourish, change, and propogate. Apparently, there are many people (and institutions) out there so deeply rooted in their religious beliefs, that you could show them something quite literally right in front of their face, and unless it was written "In scripture", it's "The devils talk".


Here is the link. As I said, I could sit here (as a layman) and tear this apart just for the part that i'm pointing out. Just like terrorists who strap explosives to themselves and kill others for their Jihad, those others who are deeply religious don't want question to creep into their theology and methodology amongst their "flock". Those who think, question. Those who question, inevitably ask why they believe in what they were taught/told to believe in. That weakens the foundation of any organized group. It's not good.


<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/VestigialOrgans.html
">http://www.creationinthecrossf.../VestigialOrgans.html
</a>

What Are Vestigial Organs?

Vestigial organs are body structures considered to have been better developed and functional in the past but to have now lost most or all of their function and some or most of their structure. Darwin called them rudimentary. Evolutionists believe they were useful in ancestral species but are slowly being phased out in modern animals. It is evolutionally correct to get rid of unneeded baggage. Examples of vestigial organs in humans usually include the appendix, the coccyx (tail bone), and the tonsils. While Robert Wiedersheim listed 180 alleged vestigial or rudimentary organs in 1895, today the list is down to a handful. Vestigial organs were considered passe' because of ignorance, but now we have discovered important biological functions and necessity for every one of them. At an ICR summer institute, Dr. Richard Lumsden stated emphatically that there are no vestigial organs. Creationists would do well to ask, "What was this made for?" when looking at a seemingly useless body part. Since God made the whole body, He had a reason for including every part.
 

Seana30

New member
okay....to the above anony.......

I have read your post twice, and I am not sure if it is because I am tired or what, but I can not figure out what you are trying to say to me.

I was in no way trying to argue anyone's point. I find everyone view interesting and am not sure where I stand on this subject.

I was just pointing out an interesting fact the doctors told me. Also, it is just the appendix that they said causes the 5x more chance of non-hogkins.

I am not trying to be a smartass here, but if you would like the name and number of the doctor that gave me this information I would be more than willing to provide it.

Seana
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Seana30</b></i>

okay....to the above anony.......



I have read your post twice, and I am not sure if it is because I am tired or what, but I can not figure out what you are trying to say to me.



I was in no way trying to argue anyone's point. I find everyone view interesting and am not sure where I stand on this subject.



I was just pointing out an interesting fact the doctors told me. Also, it is just the appendix that they said causes the 5x more chance of non-hogkins.



I am not trying to be a smartass here, but if you would like the name and number of the doctor that gave me this information I would be more than willing to provide it.



Seana</end quote></div>



FYI I am not being a smart ass or anything else subversive. I am just saying, to make a claim that outrageous (Having your childs appendix + tonsils removed = 5x more likely chance of him developing non hodgkins lymphoma), needs some real data, and some accredited research backing it to make it something worthy of anything beyond "Hey I just saw a UFO". Does this stance only exist if it is only his appendix removed? Is it only his stance if it is his appendix AND his tonsils removed? What about just his tonsils removed? Does that mean theirs a 2.5x chance of him developing the same disease? I mean if we are discussing this based in known medical factual knowledge, I was left behind like an atheist when the angels blew their horns for the rapture.


I have nothing against calling the man, but why should I want to call him? Shouldn't you want to look more deeply into such a serious insinuation? I know if it was my child I would. Opinions are one thing, but when it comes down to basically saying "Your kid now has 5 times the likelihood to develope cancer due to having his tonsils and appendix removed", I would be up his ass like a massive infestation of pinworms.
 

Seana30

New member
First off....if you would stop being so defensive (and I am not sure why you are) I just told you

IT WAS ONLY WHEN HE HAD HE'S APPENDIX OUT THAT THEY TOLD ME THIS. He had his tonsils removed years before he had his appendix removed. I did not say it was when the tonsil AND appendix were removed.....just the appendix!

I do not feel the need to research it more because it is not something I sit around and think about all day.

I am sorry I ruined your day with this information....although for the life of me I can't figure out why!!!!!!!!!

Seana
 

Seana30

New member
doctor that removed my son's appendix

DR DONALD MEIER

www.elpasosurgical.com

1700 Curie Dr Suite 1500
El Paso, TX 79902

915-543-9600
 

Seana30

New member
Your kid now has 5 times the likelihood to develope cancer due to having his tonsils and appendix removed", I would be up his ass like a massive infestation of pinworms.





One more thing......since you are attacking my choices as a mother

WHAT CHOICE DID I HAVE?????

IF WE DID NOT REMOVE HIS APPENDIX HE WOULD DIE!! LETS SEE.........LET MY SON DIE OR TAKE THE CHANCE OF HIM GETTING CANCER LATER IN LIFE.......I CHOOSE FOR HIM TO LIVE!!!!!

Seana
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>JazzysMom</b></i>

So much for the civil post! Knew it couldnt last long!</end quote></div>




/nods.


Seana: I'm not being defensive. I'm just wondering on what grounds he based that claim. I'm also not saying you shouldn't have had your kids parts removed if they needed to be removed. Calm down. I am saying that after I had his parts removed to help him, I would have asked him where he got his information/data that stated that my child now has a 5 times higher likelihood to develop cancer now due to having two generally viewed as useless organs removed. That's a pretty heavy thing to lay down on a parent: "Hi. It appears your little Billy has a very painful appendicitis, and badly enflamed/infected tonsils. We should remove these or he will die due to the appendix, and have bad problems due to the tonsils. By the way after we remove them, he will have a 5 times higher chance of developing cancer. Have a nice day".


Now does that mean his statement is complete rubbish? While it might appear that way (lots of claims can appear that way, but can turn out to atleast have some semblance of truth in the end), there is no way to know unless he backs up such an apparent outlandish claim with some form of data besides "Because I said so".


That was my only point in all of this whole discussion. There is no need to go rampant with multiple exclamation points, and tons of unneeded capitalized words back to back to convey something to me. There was never any defensiveness or aggression in anything I typed. You come into the middle of a pleasant, non drama thread where we are all discussing something in a civil manner and start off with a personal attack against someone for finding humor in George Carlin. Then it immediately turns towards "Well I don't know about that, but when my kids tonsils and appendix was removed my doc said this outlandish claim", to which I ask for clarification, and get some type of bizarre response like (with all caps to express your agitated frame of mine I assume) "I DON'T KNOW. WHY ASK ME!?!? CALL MY DOCTOR AND ASK HIM YOURSELF!!!!"


We went atleast 40+ responses with being nice to each other and enjoying others views on some pretty deep topics without such unneeded drama. It would be nice if we could get back to that frame of mind. If you disagree with me or others, that is perfectly fine. There are some in this thread who totally disagreed with my perspective, and me them. You didn't see any bashing taking place. Bashing doesn't work on this board, if it did it could atleast be mildly entertaining. Threads get locked, posts erased, people banned, and more threads are started to state intentions and ask questions regarding the other threads. It's a waste of time on here. Let's not waste each others time.
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>

About 5 years ago there was an article on how evolution was identified to be taking place within 15 years (15 YEARS!) within some very basic worm. This was done by some of the most prestigious universities that humans go to. A lifeform had literally proved to have changed via evolution within 15 years. It was one way before 15 years (I think the article stipulated it was last observed 16 years previously), and then had a stark biological and genetic difference 15 years later when it was next observed).
</end quote></div>


Only proves natural selection and adaptation not evolution. I'm sure at the end of the 15 year they were still looking at a worm.....it didn't change species.
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>



About 5 years ago there was an article on how evolution was identified to be taking place within 15 years (15 YEARS!) within some very basic worm. This was done by some of the most prestigious universities that humans go to. A lifeform had literally proved to have changed via evolution within 15 years. It was one way before 15 years (I think the article stipulated it was last observed 16 years previously), and then had a stark biological and genetic difference 15 years later when it was next observed).

</end quote></div>





Only proves natural selection and adaptation not evolution. I'm sure at the end of the 15 year they were still looking at a worm.....it didn't change species.</end quote></div>


<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution
">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolution
</a>

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/natural%20selection
">http://dictionary.reference.co...e/natural%20selection
</a>

Refering to components within the same principle. Does something only qualify as "evolution" if the change is so drastic to quite literally, "Change Species"? Something doesn't have to go from a mud mollosk to a stingray to show the process as valid. I wish I had the link and information to the study, it was pretty fascinating.


Heres a good link from NPR. Too bad I can't listen to it now.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5256811
">http://www.npr.org/templates/s...y.php?storyId=5256811
</a>
Talk of the Nation, March 10, 2006 · Are humans still evolving? There's evidence of recent evolution in Homo sapiens. Ira Flatow leads a discussion.

Guest:

Jonathan Pritchard, professor of human genetics, University of Chicago

(click the link to listen to it, it didn't give a direct text news source...I'm sure you guys can google it up if you care to)
 

Seana30

New member
I don't get it?!?!?!?!?!?

I'm causing drama?!?!?!?!?!?!?

I made a statement that pertained to this post and you went off on me!!!! I do not understand why my post upset you, I was never rude, and you attacked me.

But I'm the one causing drama?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Seana
 

anonymous

New member
Well this has gotten way off from Ender original post. But regards to the definitions of evolution....it is all semantics.

They way it was being discussed was in the "Theory of Evolution".....as in simple "evolution proves this theory". If it was actually that simple it wouldn't be a "Theory'.

Just to say because a creature can "evolve"/adapt doesn't mean/prove that a creature is capable of "evolving" into different species.
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Seana30</b></i>

I don't get it?!?!?!?!?!?



I'm causing drama?!?!?!?!?!?!?



I made a statement that pertained to this post and you went off on me!!!! I do not understand why my post upset you, I was never rude, and you attacked me.



But I'm the one causing drama?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?



Seana</end quote></div>


It didn't upset me. Where did I go off on you? I explained what took place in a previous reply, from my perspective. BTW you are doing it again. One question mark or exclamation point is sufficient in conveying a questioning or excited nature of a sentence. I refuse to take your drama bait and devolve (pun intended, I kill myself heh) this thread into a drama thread with us bashing each other.

In case you forgot, here is a recap:

(many of us) "Evolution. Neat. What do you think? Oh yeah. God? neat. Maybe. Cool. Interesting idea. etc etc"

(me) "Few silly moments refering to Joe Pesci" (Forgot to add an asterisk for credit towards George Carlin to appease Seana, I will remember to do that regarding everything in the future).

(seana) "Wow get some new material, George Carlin did that on cable"

(me) "Really? Where do you think I got it from? Can I still find it funny?"

(me) "Back to evolution and multi dimensions...blah blah, neat. etc etc"

(Seana) "Well I don't know about evolution but my doctor said my kid is now 5 times more likely to get cancer due to him having his appendix and tonsils removed"

(me) "Um, what? Where did he get that from?"

(Seana) "OMG DON'T QUESTION ME AS A MOTHER!!!!!!!! I'm JUST TRYING TO SAVE MY CHILD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CALL HIM YOURSELF IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE HIM!!!!!!"


(me) "Points his point out again"


(seana) "OMG WTF!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!"


(me) /shakes head


See having to go down this path, due to someone starting this direction, is what ends with threads getting locked, and people snapping and getting posts erased. Notice I haven't said anything bad to you this whole thread besides comically illustrating how you inform others of the colors of stop signs when seeing them, with reference to you informing us where my Joe Pesci lines came from.


...Nevermind, I don't know why I try.
 
Top